|
|
 
Introduction
My colleague, Bob Hughes, and I were moaning about the sad
state of affairs regarding the understanding of some of the dealers and
collectors regarding the Uniform minutia as it pertains to Straps. This drove
Bob to compose a scholarly piece on the subject.
This was in 1996 and it has been resting in a drawer marked
“Waiting for a Venue”.
Here it is.
The Gold or
Silver Standard
A great
deal of
discussion
has
taken
place among
insignia collectors in
the last several years centering on the issue of whether Union captains
and first
lieutenants’ shoulder
straps with
silver bars are of the Civil War period or “Indian War” period. The
resolution
of the
issue,
on a
strap
by strap
basis, results
in
sometimes large differences
in the
price of the
straps
to the
buyer
or
collector.
More
importantly, however,
the
resolution
of the
issue, across the
board,
may
serve to maintain
the
integrity
of
identification
of all of
those shoulder straps which
are indeed
of
the
Civil War
period.
Most collectors
of Civil
War
relics and
pieces will advocate never saying “never” when
it
comes to attempting to
establish
a guideline
or
rule
for
identifying a
piece
as of the
period or
not.
So it may
be with the issue of the silver bars; however the U.S. Army’s own
regulations
in
effect
at the
time
are
difficult
to ignore.
General
Orders No. 31, published June 12, 1851, provided “1….The following
description of the UNIFORM for the
Army of
the United States, having been approved by
the
Secretary of
War, is
published for general
information and will be strictly adhered to….”
.“
The SHOULDER
STRAPS
section
provides
that the straps will be one and
three-eights
inches wide
by four inches long; bordered with an embroidery of gold one-fourth of an inch
wide.
Section 119
provides: “FOR A CAPTAIN—the same as for a Colonel,…
omitting
the
eagle and
introducing
at each
end two
gold
embroidered bars of the same
width
as the
border,
placed
parallel
to
the ends
of the
strap,
at a
distance between
them
and
from
the border
equal to
the width
of the
border.” Section 120 FOR
A
FIRST LIEUTENANT, provides
the same as
for a
captain, excepting that
one gold
bar is
specified instead of two.
The
comprehensive uniform
changes established
by General
Orders No. 31 clearly provide that
captains
and first
lieutenants
would wear
shoulder straps
featuring
GOLD
embroidered bars.
The uniform
regulations of
1857, which incorporated General
Orders issued
since 1851 contain
no
changes
in the
shoulder
strap specifications
from
those
quoted
above from
the 1851 regulations.
Likewise,
General
Orders No. 6, published Mar. 13,
1861,
providing
for
the uniform which
would be
prevalent during the Civil War, made no changes in the shoulder strap
specifications
from those
promulgated in the
1851
regulations. Union captains and
first
lieutenants
went into the Civil War under orders to wear
gold bars
as their
mark of rank on
their shoulder straps.
The
wearing of silver bars for
captains and first lieutenants
on
their
shoulder
straps was first
prescribed,
after 1851,
by General Orders No. 92 published
Oct.
26,
1872.
The
language of the 1872 regulations relating to shoulder straps is the same as
that
of
1851, 1857 and
1861
regulations, with the exception of changing the
color
of the
bars
from gold
to SILVER. The silver bars have graced
the
shoulder
straps
and
undress
uniform of
captains
and first
lieutenants since 1872.
Where
could there be authority which
would lead to the confusion? In the 1851, 1857 and 1861 regulations, the
specifications for Epaulettes for captains and first lieutenants calls for
Silver bars There may be those collectors or dealers who confuse or do not
differentiate between shoulder straps and epaulettes, and therefore read this
portion of the regulations as a
basis for
the
opinion that the silver bars belong to the
Civil War
period.
All three of the cited regulations describe the epaulettes to be
devices
with a crescent, a circlet, and gold
bullion
strands of a certain diameter and length, depending upon rank, and the shoulder
straps to be a strap of a certain length and width, with a border and color
of
field
to correspond to branch or
staff. The epaulettes and shoulder straps are described as distinctly different
articles of the uniform and each occupy a separate section in all of the
regulations cited.
Another area of confusion may arise from a failure
of
the collector to ascertain any
differentiation in the color of
the bars and the bullion
borders because of the manner in which the
bars
have aged
or
acquired patina.
This is not
an issue of
interpretation of
the regulations, but rather, a pursuit
of
identification in which it is
easiest to lump
all Captains’ and first lieutenants’ shoulder straps into one period, in almost
every instance the Civil War period. In this situation, the bars have aged to a
very similar color with that of the bullion borders and the making the
distinction of gold or silver bars is difficult. If that issue
faces
the collector, a tiny drop of any one of several substances readily
available
on the
market,
carefully placed on a strand of the bullion
of the bar will, in
almost every instance, demonstrate the
true
original
color of the bar and permit an honest
identification.
Probably the most definitive evidence of whether captains and first lieutenants
bars were gold or silver during the Civil War period is gathered from observing
the color of the bars on shoulder straps which are known or strongly believed to
be original to a particular frock coat, shell jacket, or sack coat which is
itself known to be of the Civil War period. It is here that the authors must
rely upon other than the written word or personal observation. In talking with
people who have had the opportunity to handle dozens of uniform known to be of
the Civil War period, and who have studied these uniforms and their constituent
parts, it seems to be almost unanimously the conclusions of these people that
uniforms
of the
Civil War period
bearing captain’s or first lieutenant’s
shoulder straps
feature gold
bars on the shoulder
straps
rather
than
silver
bars. These same people have observed that the silver bars began showing up on
captain’s and first lieutenant’s shoulder straps on uniforms which these people
could reasonably identify as being of the post 1872 period. Although the authors
do not possess the experience of the people interviewed, they, as collectors of
shoulder straps and insignia of both the Civil War and Indian War periods, have
seen a number of
uniforms known to be of the
Civil War period bearing captains and first lieutenants shoulder straps, and in
every instance, the bars have been gold.
Another
significant body
of
evidence
relegating
the silver bars to
Captains
and first
lieutenants of the
post
1872 period
is the construction of the shoulder straps
themselves. As most collectors of shoulder straps have learned, there are
material differences in the attributes and construction of shoulder straps of
the Civil War period and of the post War period. Of the dozens of pairs of
captain’s and first lieutenant’s shoulder straps of both periods which have been
handled and examined collectively by the authors, it can be
conclusively
stated by
these authors
that the captain’s and first lieutenant’s shoulder straps which exhibited the
attributes of the Civil War period, in
every
instance bore gold bars, not silver bars. Conversely, the shoulder straps of
captains and first lieutenants exhibiting the attributes of the post War period,
in every instance, bore silver bars, not gold.
There
are those who cite to several of
the “pioneer publications in the Civil War relic and memorabilia field which
make passing references to silver bars being found on captain’s and first
lieutenant’s shoulder straps of the Civil War period. What of these references,
we are asked. A well-respected consultant on one such publication was questioned
by the authors regarding such a reference in the publication, and he answered
emphatically that the reference was an error which was overlooked in preprinting
text review. He added his observation that gold bars belong to the Civil War
period and silver to the post 1872 period. As for the few other publications
which continue to carry references to silver bars on the ranks in question being
found on Civil War shoulder straps, the authors can only believe that those
observations were made at an early time in collecting when this distinction may
not have been so important. These few publications to which the authors refer
have not been revised or updated in a number of years.
Why, the
reader asks, do the authors go
to such lengths to write an article on this narrow subject, which may only
interest a few? Price of items aside, for the moment, the authors believe that
the collectors of our history’s relics and pieces have an obligation to preserve
these items,
to the
extent possible, for future generations to enjoy and study. If those who come
behind us are to have an accurate view and understanding of that which went
before, those who preserve the items must also pass along as accurate a history
and description as is possible, given the information available at any given
time. Thus, to sanitize a pair of post 1872 captain’s shoulder straps, and pass
them along as of the Civil War period, is to deceive those who come later
regarding the place these items occupy in history. This same principle of
accurately describing the item is as applicable to the largest siege gun as it
is to the captain’s shoulder straps.
The
categorization of the shoulder straps in one of the two periods inevitably leads
to a pricing difference to the collector or dealer. In the current marketplace,
Civil War period shoulder straps command a significantly higher price than their
Indian War counterparts. It is not unusual to find dealers or collectors
offering silver barred captain’s or first lieutenant’s, shoulder straps for sale
as being of the Civil War period, at
prices
which would be appropriate if the straps were of that period. Once sold on that
basis,
these straps will again be offered as of the Civil War period
for
at least the
reason that the owner now has Civil War
prices
invested in
them and they have stood the test of
categorization
at least once.
It
has been
the authors’ individual and collective experience that it is difficult to
successfully argue with dealers who offer the silver barred straps for sale as
of the Civil
War
period. In most
such instances, these dealers will admit to
not
having read the
regulations cited in this article, but will tell you that they
have
‘run it by some
people who
know.”
It is the
authors’ hope
that
a
dissemination
of
information
on
this
subject
will begin
to flow among those who collect and deal in these items. Perhaps, armed with
information such as is
contained
in
this
article,
collectors
and dealers can make
their own
reasoned
decision
regarding
the proper category for the straps they sell
and buy, and, in
addition to historical
information
on
the
straps being
accurately passed along, the pricing structure may adjust itself appropriately.
Given the body of evidence available, the authors have concluded
that, in
the gold
bar/silver bar controversy, it is safe and accurate to rely upon the regulations
which
where
promulgated
contemporaneously with the sewing of the shoulder straps in question. The
authors hold the opinion, based upon the evidence at hand, that the gold bars on
shoulder straps
belong,
to the
Civil War period
and
the
silver
to the post
1872 period.
|
|